Skip to main content

This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1499

reference
862-tree-1
name
1499
tree-preservation-order

undefined

862-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-0.971052 50.867007)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-0.971010 50.867003,-0.971012 50.867011,-0.971018 50.867019,-0.971027 50.867025,-0.971039 50.867029,-0.971052 50.867030,-0.971065 50.867029,-0.971077 50.867025,-0.971087 50.867019,-0.971093 50.867012,-0.971095 50.867003,-0.971093 50.866995,-0.971087 50.866988,-0.971078 50.866981,-0.971053 50.866976,-0.971040 50.866977,-0.971028 50.866981,-0.971018 50.866987,-0.971012 50.866994,-0.971010 50.867003)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL